- Find the best broker for your trading needs
- Compare spreads, fees, and platforms
- Read in-depth reviews and analysis
75-90% of retail traders lose money trading Forex and CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs and leveraged trading work and if you can afford the high risk of losing your money. We may receive compensation when you click on links to products we review. Please read our advertising disclosure. By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Service.
The spread is the one cost you can’t avoid – deducted on every trade, every pair, every session. Over hundreds of trades, the difference between a tight and loose spread adds up fast. Most traders overlook the cost quietly eating into every result, and headline numbers rarely tell the full story.
Here, I break down which brokers actually deliver the lowest trading costs, how to compare them properly, and where the hidden costs sit. Every broker on this list was selected for their low spread offering. They all share the following:
Trusted. Transparent. Tested.
For over a decade, we’ve set the standard in forex broker reviews—collecting thousands of data points yearly to deliver unbiased, expert-backed insights.
Skip the trial and error! Below, you’ll find the best Malaysian forex brokers for 2026—thoroughly tested, verified, and ranked, so you can trade with confidence.
Swipe to scroll
Broker | Overall Rating Our broker score evaluates brokers on platform quality, fees, service, regulation, and instruments. Higher scores reflect better performance and reliability. | Visit Broker Website Click to visit the broker’s official website for more information and to open an account. | Account Name | Trading Cost Raw Spread Account: Total trading cost at the time of last update, for 1 lot of EUR/USD. Includes spread and commission. | Min. Deposit The minimum deposit required to trade using the selected account | Trading Commission | Regulated by FCA | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zero | USD 4.50 | AUD 0 | 4.5 USD/lot | No | 0 pips | 0 pips | 0 pips | 0 pips | 0 pips | 0 pips | 0 pips | 0 pips | 0 pips | ||||
RAW - MetaTrader | USD 7.20 | USD 200 | 7 USD / lot | No | 0.02 pips | 0.23 pips | 0.14 pips | 0.50 pips | 0.17 pips | 0.27 pips | 0.30 pips | 0.25 pips | 0.19 pips | ||||
ProZero | USD 9 | USD 200 | 5 USD / lot | No | 0.30 pips | 1.60 pips | 1.20 pips | 0 pips | 0 pips | 0 pips | 0 pips | 0 pips | 0 pips | ||||
XM Ultra Low | USD 1 | USD 5 | Spread Only | No | 0.60 pips | 0.60 pips | 0.60 pips | 1.20 pips | 0.40 pips | 0.30 pips | 0.40 pips | 0.50 pips | 0.40 pips | ||||
Zero | USD 7 | USD 0 | 6 USD / lot | Yes | 0.10 pips | 0.50 pips | 0.30 pips | 0.70 pips | 0.40 pips | 0.40 pips | 0.50 pips | 0.50 pips | 0.50 pips | ||||
Raw | USD 7 | USD 100 | 6 USD/lot | Yes | 0.10 pips | 0.30 pips | 0.10 pips | 0.90 pips | 0.10 pips | 0.40 pips | 0.50 pips | 0.20 pips | 0.40 pips | ||||
Prime | USD 1.80 | 0 | No | 0.18 pips | 0.66 pips | 0.44 pips | 0 pips | 0.57 pips | 0.51 pips | 0.67 pips | 0.66 pips | 0.72 pips | |||||
RAW | USD 6 | AUD 100 | 6 USD / lot | No | 0 pips | 0.10 pips | 0 pips | 0.30 pips | 0 pips | 0.10 pips | 0.20 pips | 0.20 pips | 0.30 pips | ||||
FxPro cTrader | USD 11 | USD 100 | 7 USD/ lot | Yes | 0.40 pips | 1.00 pips | 0.60 pips | 1.34 pips | 1.00 pips | 10.10 pips | 1.45 pips | 1.30 pips | 1.20 pips |
Find Your Ideal Forex Broker
Top picks
0 pips
VFSC, ASIC
AUD 0
TradingView, MT5, cTrader, MT4
500:1
Fusion Markets offers its “Zero” account to Malaysian clients with spreads starting from 0.0 pips on major pairs, paired with a transparent commission of around USD 4.50 per standard lot round-turn.
For the Malaysian market, Fusion Markets allows account opening with no fixed minimum deposit, meaning traders can start with very low capital while still accessing their low-spread pricing model.
With up to 1:500 leverage and reported average execution times as fast as 0.05 seconds, Malaysian traders focusing on tight spread strategies have low latency and high flexibility.
Fusion Markets supports many deposit methods with zero fees and offers country-specific providers, which helps Malaysian traders keep costs down before even placing trades.
Although Fusion Markets is regulated by Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) in Australia, Malaysian clients are onboarded via its Vanuatu or Seychelles entities, meaning local regulatory protections (such as under Securities Commission Malaysia) are not available.
While the headline “0.0 pips” is attractive, achieving those spreads often depends on instrument, time of day and volume. Malaysian traders should still expect some variation in live conditions, and the cost of commission and other layers may matter.
0.1 pips
CMA, FSA-Seychelles, SCB, CySEC
USD 200
TradingView, MT5, cTrader, MT4
500:1
Raw Spread Account offers average 0.1 pips on EUR/USD with no markup – sourced from 25+ liquidity providers.
Lower than many ECN brokers – reduces overall cost per trade for volume traders and scalpers.
IC Markets’ servers are co-located with major liquidity hubs – ideal for HFT and automated traders.
Great option for advanced Malaysian traders using custom bots or hosting Expert Advisors (EAs).
Fully online setup may deter traders who prefer local broker presence or workshops.
Limited education and no proprietary platform – beginners may struggle to navigate account choices.
IC Markets | Best for: Traders who demand institutional-grade spreads with ultra-fast execution and low-latency conditions.
FxScouts
1 pips
FSA-St-Vincent, FSCA, ASIC
USD 50
MT5, MT4
500:1
0.6 pips
FSC, DFSA, CySEC, ASIC
USD 5
MT5, MT4
1000:1
No commissions – spreads are among the tightest for standard account types globally.
Great for new traders testing the platform risk-free and boosting capital with promotions.
Ideal for learning and networking – unique local support rarely seen among competitors.
Available without swap and supports FPX and bank transfers in MYR.
Standard and Ultra-Low accounts are commission-free but not as tight as raw spread options.
Only MT4/MT5 are supported – not ideal for traders who prefer depth-of-market tools.
XM | Best for: Malaysian beginners looking for competitive spreads with bonus incentives and strong education.
FxScouts
0.0 pips
CMA, FSA-Seychelles, FSC, FCA, FSCA
USD 0
HFM Trading App, MT5, MT4
1000:1
Competitive spreads during major trading sessions – commissions from $6/lot round turn.
Generous reward systems help new and active traders earn extra without increasing risk.
Fully localized payment channels via FPX, CIMB, Maybank, etc.
Autochartist, VPS, and analytics help traders make informed decisions without extra cost.
Despite tight spreads, market volatility can still cause spikes – not always ideal for scalping.
Many account options (Premium, Zero, PAMM) may overwhelm new users.
HFM | Best for: Malaysian traders looking for solid spreads with excellent bonus programs and local withdrawal options.
FxScouts
Most traders obsess over strategy, platforms, and leverage, but overlook the cost that affects every single trade they place. The spread is paid the moment you open a position. Understanding it and knowing how to compare it accurately is one of the most practically valuable things I’ve learned as a trader, and it’s what I want to pass on here.
A forex spread is the difference between the bid price (the price at which the market will buy from you) and the ask price (the price at which the market will sell to you). Spreads are measured in pips, the smallest standard unit of price movement in forex. Without going into too much detail, a pip represents $0.0001 for most pairs (and $0.01 for Japanese Yen pairs).
Watch this great video on how pips work for a more detailed explanation.
Here’s a simple example: if EUR/USD is quoted at 1.1000 (ask price) / 1.0998 (bid price), the spread is 2 pips. That means every position I open starts 2 pips in the red – I have to earn that back before I’m in profit. Early on, I didn’t think much of it. A pip here, a pip there, it’s only a fraction after all, but once I started tracking my costs across a full month of trading, I realised how quickly it adds up. Over hundreds or thousands of trades, the spread is one of the biggest line items in your trading costs, and most traders never look at it that closely.
From what I’ve seen, spreads vary depending on several factors:
This is the most important concept to understand before choosing a low-spread broker. A broker advertising ‘0.0 pip spreads’ is not offering free trading, they charge a commission instead. The total cost depends on both the spread and the commission combined.
A standard account has no per-trade commission. The broker earns money by marking up the spread – typically adding 0.6 to 1.0 pip above the raw interbank price. On a standard lot (100,000 units), 1 pip on EUR/USD equals roughly $10, so a 1.0 pip standard spread costs $10 to enter a position. I like the simplicity of this model because it’s predictable and easy to budget around, but it’s also more expensive for anyone trading actively.
A raw account passes on the interbank spread with no markup – typically 0.0 to 0.2 pips on EUR/USD – and charges a fixed commission per lot instead. The all-in cost is spread plus commission. When I first switched to a raw account, the difference was immediately obvious: a 0.17 pip spread plus a $7 round-turn commission equals $8.70 total per standard lot – versus $10 on a 1.0 pip standard account. For traders placing many trades, this saving compounds significantly over time.
I’ve put together an all-in cost comparison so you can see what you actually pay per standard lot on EUR/USD at some of the top low-spread brokers:
| Broker | Account | Avg spread (EUR/USD) | Commission (RT) | All-in cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fusion Markets | Zero (raw) | 0.09 pips | $4.50 ✓ | ~$5.40 / ~0.54 pips ✓ |
| IC Markets | Raw Spread | 0.10 pips | $7.00 | ~$8.00 / ~0.80 pips |
| ACY Securities | ProZero (raw) | 0.10 pips | $6.00 | ~$7.00 / ~0.70 pips |
| XM | Zero (raw) | 0.10 pips | $7.00 | ~$8.00 / ~0.80 pips |
| HFM | Zero (raw) | 0.10 pips | $6.00 | ~$7.00 / ~0.70 pips |
| Fusion Markets | Classic (standard) | 0.90 pips | $0 | ~$9.00 / ~0.90 pips |
| IC Markets | Standard | 0.80 pips | $0 | ~$8.00 / ~0.80 pips |
| ACY Securities | Standard | 1.00 pips | $0 | ~$10.00 / ~1.00 pips |
| XM | Ultra Low | 0.80 pips | $0 | ~$8.00 / ~0.80 pips |
| HFM | Premium (standard) | 1.20 pips | $0 | ~$12.00 / ~1.20 pips |
All-in cost = (avg spread × $10) + round-turn commission, per standard lot (100,000 units) on EUR/USD. Spread averages are based on peak London/New York session liquidity and sourced from FxScouts broker reviews. Spreads widen outside peak hours and during news events.
The practical conclusion is that for active traders placing 20 or more trades per month at standard lot sizes, a raw account is materially cheaper than any standard account. For traders placing fewer than 10 to 15 trades per month at smaller sizes, the simplicity of a standard account often outweighs the marginal cost saving. I’d choose based on how frequently you actually trade, not how frequently you plan to trade.
While tight spreads can be important, they’re not equally important to every trader. Whether they materially affect your profitability depends entirely on how you trade. Here’s my rule-of-thumb based on my own experience across different styles.
Scalping targets profits of a few pips per trade by opening and closing positions quickly. For example, a 1.0 pip spread on a 3-pip target means you need a 1.0 pip move before you break even, while a 0.17 pip spread on the same trade means you’re profitable after 0.17 pips. When I tested scalping strategies, this difference was immediately obvious. My results changed noticeably depending on which broker I used. For scalpers placing 50 to 200 trades per month, the difference between a 0.54 pip and a 1.0 pip all-in cost can run to hundreds of dollars a month. In my view, for scalping, a raw account at the tightest-spread broker you can find is almost a prerequisite if you’re serious about it.
I spend most of my trading time as a day trader, so I know this one pretty well. When holding positions for minutes to hours, the spread is a constant presence, particularly on frequently traded pairs. I’ve done the maths: the all-in cost difference between 0.54 pips and 1.0 pips on 20 trades per week at a standard lot is roughly $92 per week, that’s over $4,700 per year. Once I saw that number, switching to a raw account made more sense. For anyone operating at meaningful volume, the added complexity of a commission structure can be worth it.
Automated strategies depend on tight, consistent spreads and fast execution to function as designed in backtests. I’ve run EAs that looked profitable on my demo account, but fell apart on a live account because the spread conditions were completely different. A strategy tested at 0.1 pip spreads that encounters 1.0 pip live spreads can produce very different results. If you’re running EAs, strongly consider brokers whose demo spreads match live conditions and whose execution infrastructure is co-located with major liquidity hubs.
If you’re targeting 100 to 500 pips per trade over days or weeks, the difference between 0.54 pips and 1.0 pips is largely irrelevant relative to the trade target. I’ve done longer-term trades where the spread was the last thing on my mind, and rightly so. For swing and position traders, regulation, platform quality, and overnight swap rates matter more than the headline spread. For this type of trading, I’ve found that the simplicity of a standard account is often a better fit, and to me that’s completely fine.
As mentioned before, the advertised minimum spread is a starting point, not the full picture. Many new traders (me included) have made the mistake early on of taking the headline number at face value. Having learned this lesson, these are the four things I check before opening any low-spread account.
A broker advertising ‘0.0 pips on EUR/USD’ is quoting the minimum – the tightest the spread ever reaches, usually for a fraction of a second during peak liquidity. That number is basically just marketing. And while you can technically get that, what matters more is the average spread across a session. Some brokers are upfront about this. I won’t open an account now without comparing averages first, not minimums, for the account type and pair I’m trading.
Milliseconds matter. A tight spread means nothing if your order doesn’t fill at the quoted price. Slippage is the gap between what you see and what you get, and it can wipe out a 0.1 pip spread advantage in a single trade. I’ve had sessions where my entry price was clearly worse than what I clicked – usually during volatile moments or thin liquidity. If you’re scalping or running EAs, the execution infrastructure behind the spread matters just as much as the spread itself. Many brokers advertise their average execution speeds, so remember to also look at this number when making a decision.
Every broker I’ve tested widens their spreads during major announcements like NFP, CPI, rate decisions. A EUR/USD spread sitting at 0.09 pips can jump to 5–10 pips for a few seconds around a high-impact release. I’ve had stop-losses triggered not by the market moving against me, but purely by the spread blowing out during a news spike. If you trade around these windows, factor it in, otherwise it will catch you out.
Raw account commissions at top-ranking brokers vary. I always check whether there’s a volume tier available before I assume the published commission is my actual cost – it’s an easy thing to miss, and the savings add up. Just remember to be realistic about the volume you are going to trade, rather underestimate than overestimate.
Different traders have different cost and platform priorities. Based on my testing, here’s what I’d recommend depending on your situation.
| My situation | Best pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| I want the lowest all-in cost with no minimum deposit | Fusion Markets | Lowest all-in EUR/USD cost at ~0.54 pips – $2.25/side commission, raw spread averages 0.09 pips, no minimum deposit, ASIC-regulated, supports MYR local bank transfers |
| I want the tightest raw spreads and the most platform choice | IC Markets | Average EUR/USD raw spread of 0.10 pips with MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView all available – ASIC and CySEC regulated, $200 minimum deposit |
| I want raw spreads from an ASIC-regulated broker with low commission | ACY Securities | ProZero account at ~0.70 pips all-in, $6 RT commission, ASIC-regulated, MT4, MT5, and proprietary platform available, $200 minimum deposit |
| I want the lowest minimum deposit with a raw account | XM | Zero account from just $5 minimum deposit – raw spreads from 0.0 pips, $7 RT commission, multi-regulated (CySEC, DFSA, FSCA), MT4 and MT5 |
| I want a commission-free standard account with low spreads | HFM | Premium account with no minimum deposit, 1.20 pip spreads, zero commission – FCA, CySEC, FSCA, and DFSA regulated, MT4, MT5, and HFM App |
Most low-spread brokers offer both a standard and a raw account. Here’s the process I follow to select and open the right one for me. Your trading needs will differ, but the steps stay the same.
I use the all-in cost comparison table on this page to calculate the real cost for my intended trading frequency and position size. If you trade fewer than 15 trades per month at micro or mini lot sizes, a standard account may be simpler and not materially more expensive. If you trade frequently at standard lot sizes, a raw account will almost always be cheaper over time. I’d base this decision on how you actually trade, not how you aspire to. Remember, be realistic and honest with yourself.
Before I open an account, I find the broker’s published average spread data for the account type and pair I plan to trade. The all-in cost column in the comparison table above uses FxScouts-verified averages. If a broker only publishes minimum spreads, I treat advertised ‘0.0 pip’ figures with scepticism until I can verify average spread data independently. I’ve been caught out by this before, and now I always do my own checks.
I open a demo on the raw account, not the standard, if that’s what I plan to trade live. I test the actual spread behaviour during my intended trading hours across at least one week. Spreads during my specific session have differed from peak-hour averages more often than I expected, and I’ve found this step saves me from surprises later.
All regulated brokers require KYC (Know Your Customer) identity verification before a live account can be funded. In my experience, this typically takes a few hours. I always have a government-issued ID and proof of address ready to go. If a broker doesn’t require these documents, it’s a big red flag.
In your first week of live trading, monitor the actual spread on your account during the sessions you trade. Confirm that live spreads are consistent with what you observed in the demo and what the broker publishes. If they diverge significantly, contact support for an explanation before scaling up. I’ve had to do this once – it’s worth checking. Remember, if you’re unsure, ask.
Find answers to common questions about low-spread Forex brokers, including what is considered a low spread, why they matter, and the differences between raw spread and standard accounts.
It’s the difference between the bid (sell) and ask (buy) price of a currency pair, measured in pips. It’s the primary transaction cost on every trade. A 1.0 pip EUR/USD spread means your trade starts 1.0 pip in the negative – the market has to move 1.0 pip in your favour before you break even. On a standard lot, 1 pip equals roughly $10 for USD-quoted pairs.
A raw account offers the interbank spread with no broker markup – typically 0.0–0.2 pips on EUR/USD – and charges a fixed commission per lot instead. This passes institutional-grade pricing to retail traders. The all-in cost is spread plus commission. Raw accounts are also called ECN accounts, Zero accounts, or Razor accounts depending on the broker.
For active traders, yes. For low-frequency traders, not necessarily. When I compared the numbers, a Fusion Markets raw account costs roughly $5.40 all-in per standard lot versus $8.00 on their standard account – a $2.60 saving per trade. Over 50 trades per month at standard lot sizes, that’s $130 per month I’d be leaving on the table. For traders placing fewer than 10 small trades per month, the commission complexity may not be worth the savings.
Fusion Markets, at approximately $5.40 per standard lot on its Raw account (0.09 pips average spread plus $4.50 round-turn commission). IC Markets offers a raw spread averaging 0.02 pips, with a slightly higher all-in cost of roughly $6.20. The best choice depends on your platform preferences and whether you prioritise the lowest spread or the lowest total cost.
Yes, always – at every broker, on every account type. During high-impact releases (NFP, CPI, central bank decisions), liquidity providers pull back and brokers widen their quotes. A EUR/USD spread that averages 0.09 pips can briefly widen to 5–10 pips during a news spike. Strategies that trade around news events should account for this directly. I’ve seen stop-losses triggered by the spread widening alone.
Major pairs – EUR/USD, USD/JPY, GBP/USD, AUD/USD, USD/CAD, USD/CHF, NZD/USD – consistently have the tightest spreads because they’re the most liquid. EUR/USD typically has the lowest spread of all. Minor pairs (EUR/GBP, EUR/JPY) are moderately wider, and exotic pairs can be 10–20x wider than EUR/USD even at the lowest-spread brokers on this list.
No. Raw accounts offer lower costs for active traders but add commission complexity that’s unnecessary for beginners trading small sizes infrequently. When I started out, I used a standard account and I’d recommend the same – it’s simpler to understand and budget around while you’re learning. The cost difference on a single small trade is a few dollars at most. Raw accounts become worthwhile once you’re placing 20 or more trades per month, or trading at standard lot sizes regularly.
Slippage happens when your order fills at a different price than the one shown when you clicked buy or sell. It occurs most often during news events or low-liquidity periods, and it adds to your effective trading cost on top of the spread. A 0.09 pip spread is far less useful if you’re regularly experiencing 0.3 pip slippage at execution. This is why execution speed and server infrastructure matter as much as the spread when choosing a low-cost broker.
For a standard account: total cost = spread in pips × $10 per standard lot. For a raw account: total cost = (spread in pips × $10) + round-turn commission. To compare accounts on equal terms, convert the commission to a pip equivalent by dividing by $10. Example: $6.00 commission = 0.6 pip equivalent. A 0.09 pip raw spread plus $6.00 commission = 0.69 pip all-in cost = $6.90 per standard lot. This formula is the only reliable way to compare brokers across different account structures – and it’s the one I use every time.
Explore more resources that fellow traders find helpful! Check out these other guides to enhance your forex trading knowledge and skills. Whether you’re searching for the best brokers, educational material, or something more specific, we’ve got you covered:
60-90% of retail traders lose money trading Forex and CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs and leveraged trading work and if you can afford the high risk of losing your money. We may receive compensation when you click on links to products we review. Please read our advertising disclosure. By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Service.